Introduction

For many organisations, the audit fee is one of the more visible costs associated with financial reporting. It is reasonable to ask what sits behind that fee and why audits conducted under the International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) can represent a significant investment.

The answer lies in the depth, rigour, and professional judgement required to perform a quality audit. An audit is not a standardised checklist or compliance exercise. It is a structured, risk-based assurance process designed to provide stakeholders with confidence that the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

A Risk-Based Process

Every audit begins with obtaining a thorough understanding of the organisation, its industry, operating environment, governance structure, systems, processes, and internal controls. Auditors are required to identify and assess the risks of material misstatement and tailor their approach to address those risks.

The level of effort required during planning helps ensure the audit focuses on the areas that matter most to stakeholders, rather than applying a generic approach across all entities.

Professional Judgement, Scepticism and Audit Evidence

A core requirement of the ISAs is that auditors obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to support their opinion on the financial statements.

Importantly, auditors provide reasonable assurance, not an absolute guarantee. Achieving reasonable assurance requires careful evaluation of risks, consideration of alternative explanations, and the application of professional scepticism throughout the engagement.

Each audit finding and conclusion must be supported by evidence and documented in sufficient detail to demonstrate that the work performed complies with professional standards.

The collection, evaluation, and documentation of audit evidence is one of the most significant drivers of audit effort and cost.

Complexity

No two organisations are the same. The complexity of an entity can have a significant impact on the nature and extent of audit work required.

Factors that commonly increase audit effort include:

  • Complex revenue recognition arrangements;
  • Significant accounting estimates and judgements;
  • Asset valuations and impairment assessments;
  • Acquisitions, restructures, and business combinations;
  • Group structures involving multiple entities or jurisdictions;
  • Reliance on sophisticated information systems;
  • Industry-specific regulatory requirements; and
  • First-year audits or significant changes to finance systems and personnel.

As complexity increases, so too does the amount of evidence required, the extent of audit procedures performed, and the level of specialist expertise that may be needed.

Technical Expertise

Audits often require input from professionals with specialised skills beyond traditional financial statement auditing.

Depending on the circumstances, audit teams may involve specialists in areas such as:

  • Information technology and cybersecurity;
  • Business and asset valuations;
  • Taxation;
  • Sustainability and climate-related reporting; and
  • Forensic and fraud-related matters.

This multidisciplinary approach helps ensure that complex matters are evaluated appropriately and contributes to the overall quality and reliability of the audit.

Technology

Technology continues to transform the audit profession. Data analytics, automated testing tools and digital audit platforms allow auditors to analyse larger volumes of information and perform certain procedures more efficiently.

These technologies can improve audit quality and consistency while reducing manual effort in some areas. However, technology does not replace professional judgement. Auditors must still interpret results, investigate anomalies, evaluate assumptions, determine appropriate responses to identified risks, and draw conclusions based on the evidence obtained.

Quality Management, Ethics and Independence

Audit firms operate within a highly regulated environment and are subject to extensive professional, ethical, and quality management requirements.

Before and throughout an engagement, firms must comply with requirements relating to:

  • Independence and conflicts of interest;
  • Ethical responsibilities;
  • Client acceptance and continuance processes;
  • Engagement quality reviews;
  • Staff training and competency;
  • Monitoring and quality management systems; and
  • Regulatory inspections and professional oversight.

These processes are essential to maintaining confidence in the audit profession and ensuring that audit opinions remain objective, independent, and reliable.

While much of this work happens behind the scenes, it represents a critical component of delivering a quality audit.

The Value Behind the Cost

When viewed solely as a compliance requirement, an audit fee can appear significant. However, the value of an audit extends well beyond meeting statutory obligations.

A well-executed audit can:

  • Enhance confidence in financial reporting;
  • Support informed decision-making by boards and management;
  • Increase credibility with lenders, investors, regulators, and other stakeholders;
  • Identify control weaknesses and process improvement opportunities; and
  • Strengthen trust in an organisation’s governance and reporting practices.

The cost of an audit reflects the expertise, professional judgement, evidence gathering, quality safeguards, and accountability required to deliver an independent opinion that stakeholders can rely upon.

Final Thoughts

A financial audit conducted in accordance with the ISAs is a rigorous and highly disciplined process. The time, expertise, technology, documentation, quality controls, and professional scepticism involved are all critical to providing reliable assurance over an organisation’s financial reporting.

Rather than being viewed simply as a regulatory cost, a quality audit should be seen as an investment in transparency, credibility, and stakeholder confidence. Ultimately, the value of an audit lies not just in the opinion issued, but in the trust it helps build between organisations and those who rely on their financial information.

_______________________________________________________________________________

About the Author

Craig Hemphill, Audit Partner, Moore Markhams Auckland

Craig Hemphill

Craig Hemphill leads the audit division at Moore Markhams Auckland, having joined the firm in 1997 and become a partner in 2005. He delivers assurance and financial reporting services to multinational and local clients across manufacturing, software, distribution, forestry and the not-for-profit sector, and advises on due diligence for mergers and acquisitions. Craig served as National Chairman of Moore Markhams New Zealand from 2019 to 2023.